My first choice, Thomas RITCHIE, I picked because I know quite a bit about him already. I have many documents including birth, marriage, census and naturalization records and a number of pictures. That might seem counterintuitive, but I have two goals here.
First I want to really work on my source citations within my genealogy program. Using Tom as my subject gives me many different types of documents to use. I feel that once I’ve gotten every piece of data I have for Tom properly documented and cited, I’ll have a better understanding of how to handle a wide range of sources. This goal is related as much to better understanding and utilizing my software as it is to source citations.
Second, because I have so much information on Tom it will allow me to work on my overall organizational strategy as well. I’m going to think of it as a mini-project. If I can get all the pictures and documents, both digital and paper, in a form that makes sense then I’ll be in good shape for working on those ancestors where I have much less to go on.
Marker of Gertrude's mother |
By having these two goals in front of me - and ONLY these two – I should be able to overcome some of the debilitating effects of that disorder I have – GADD. I’ve written about it before and it still haunts me ;-) In addition, having a very narrow scope will allow me to use what little time I have without being overwhelmed just trying to decide where to start.
Up next, what I know and don't know about Gertrude and a few wild-eyed theories as well. I hope some of you out there will stop by to poke holes in my theories or offer some words of wisdom or both!
Can't wait to here more. I like your approach. Now, if I could just carve a little time out in my schedule to crank out a blog post.
ReplyDelete~C
Well done! I'm in awe of your discipline - too much GADD here to get that narrowly focused.
ReplyDeleteCaroline ~ Time is something there never seems to be enough of these days!
ReplyDeleteNolichucky ~ There is nothing to be in awe of - yet! I am great a making plans...but now I have to actually DO it...then you can be in awe ;-)
Best of luck! Everytime I try to focus on one person I seem to find a great new resource that could help with many others and then I'm off track...again!
ReplyDeleteI've decided that there are at least two kinds of researchers. First is the multi-tasking type who is not only good at following multiple leads, but is often bored with plodding in a straight line. The other type is, like you say, often so overwhelmed by the vast number of choices that they get paralyzed. I say, recognize your style and act accordingly, like you have.
ReplyDeleteAppreciate your perspective. We seem to be swimmers in a sea of genealogy information. Do we travel neatly from point A to point B, or are we swept by the currents along a grand tour? It can be a good journey in any case.
ReplyDeleteHi, I just selected your blog for the Ancestor Approved Award. You can go to my site http://haugenhistory.blogspot.com/2011/02/ancestor-approved-award-winners.html to get the picture and post it on your wall. Good job with your blog.
ReplyDeleteAstrid
I think it is a great idea to choose someone from your database and seek to find all you can about them. Who knows what you will find!
ReplyDelete